Combinatorial Proofs of Fermat's, Lucas's, and Wilson's Theorems

نویسندگان

  • Peter G. Anderson
  • Arthur T. Benjamin
  • Jeremy A. Rouse
چکیده

The Lucas numbers, 2, 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18, 29, 47, . . . , named in honor of Edouard Lucas (1842-1891), are defined by L0 = 2, L1 = 1, and Ln = Ln−1 + Ln−2 for n ≥ 2. It is easy to show that, for n ≥ 1, Ln counts the ways to create a bracelet of length n using beads of length one or two, where bracelets that differ by a rotation or a reflection are still considered distinct. For example, there are four bracelets of length three. (Such a bracelet can have three beads of length one, or it can have a bead of length two and a bead of length one, where the bead of length one can be in position one, two, or three.) Let f act on bracelets of prime length p by rotating each bead clockwise one unit. Clearly f leaves any bracelet unchanged. Since f has just one fixed point (when all beads have length one), we conclude that Lp ≡ 1 (mod p) for each prime p. More generally, as defined in [4], for nonnegative integers a and b, the Lucas sequence (of the second kind) is defined by V0 = 2, V1 = a, and Vn = aVn−1 + bVn−2 for n ≥ 2. Again, it is easy to show [1] that Vn with n ≥ 1 counts colored bracelets of length n, where there are a color choices for beads of length one and b color choices for beads of length two. By the same argument as earlier, with the exception of those bracelets consisting of length one beads all of the same color, when p is prime every bracelet can be rotated to create p distinct bracelets. Thus, for p prime,

منابع مشابه

On Some Generalizations of Fermat's, Lucas's and Wilson's Theorems

“Never underestimate a theorem that counts something!” – or so says J. Fraleigh in his classic text [2]. Indeed, in [1] and [4], the authors derive Fermat’s (little), Lucas’s and Wilson’s theorems, among other results, all from a single combinatorial lemma. This lemma can be derived by applying Burnside’s theorem to an action by a cyclic group of prime order. In this note, we generalize this le...

متن کامل

On Kummer's Memoir of 1857 Concerning Fermat's Last Theorem.

where x, y and z are integers and X is an odd prime, is deficient and incorrect in several respects. Kummer attempts to prove four theorems which in my first paper were numbered I to IV. I pointed out that the proofs of Theorems I and IV are incomplete, and that the proofs of Theorems I I and I I I are inaccurate. In the present paper additions to and modifications of Kummer's arguments will be...

متن کامل

A String of Pearls: Proofs of Fermat's Little Theorem

We discuss mechanised proofs of Fermat’s Little Theorem in a variety of styles, focusing in particular on an elegant combinatorial “necklace” proof that has not been mechanised previously. What is elegant in prose turns out to be long-winded mechanically, and so we examine the effect of explicitly appealing to group theory. This has pleasant consequences both for the necklace proof, and also fo...

متن کامل

The Perfect Number Theorem and Wilson's Theorem

This article formalizes proofs of some elementary theorems of number theory (see [1, 26]): Wilson’s theorem (that n is prime iff n > 1 and (n − 1)! ∼= −1 (mod n)), that all primes (1 mod 4) equal the sum of two squares, and two basic theorems of Euclid and Euler about perfect numbers. The article also formally defines Euler’s sum of divisors function φ, proves that φ is multiplicative and that ...

متن کامل

Generalized Kneser Coloring Theorems with Combinatorial Proofs

The Kneser conjecture (1955) was proved by Lovász (1978) using the Borsuk-Ulam theorem; all subsequent proofs, extensions and generalizations also relied on Algebraic Topology results, namely the Borsuk-Ulam theorem and its extensions. Only in 2000, Matoušek provided the first combinatorial proof of the Kneser conjecture. Here we provide a hypergraph coloring theorem, with a combinatorial proof...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

متن کامل
عنوان ژورنال:
  • The American Mathematical Monthly

دوره 112  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005